Home > Chemical > Replacing Traditional Coal With Bio Coal Would Cut Carbon Emissions — Scientists

Replacing Traditional Coal With Bio Coal Would Cut Carbon Emissions — Scientists

Coal made from plant waste could help cut annual carbon dioxide emissions by more than 730 million tons by 2030, according to a new study from China.

Researchers at the University of Science and Technology in China say bio-coal could also help improve food supplies by replacing bio-fuels made from grain.

The team say that if coal was replaced with their plant based alternative, made from forest and agricultural waste, then millions of tons of carbon wouldn’t be released.

The bio-coal they produced is an ‘energy efficient’ solid by-product of distilling bio-oil – an existing ‘plant product’ which they say is ‘highly corrosive and inefficient’.

Scroll down for video

Coal made from plant waste could help cut annual carbon dioxide emissions by more than 700 million tons by 2030, according to a new study from China. Plant based coal was produced by distilling bio-oil made from rice husks

The team estimate that by 2030 about 400 million tons of ‘bio-coal’ could be produced every year, all of which could directly replace the fossil fuel.

Bio-coal could ‘help fast-track climate change mitigation efforts by providing an accessible opportunity for developing countries to switch out conventional fossil fuels for renewable energy’, say the team.

The researchers say other options such as bio-gas involve ‘dipping into the food supply’, something many developing nations don’t have the resources to do.

Bio-oil synthesized from the thermal decomposition of plant waste has been identified as an alternative to grain-based biofuels for some time, the team say.

‘Bio-oils are strongly corrosive, chemically unstable, and produce comparatively little heat during combustion – so aren’t widely used.’

The China team decided to try and produce a form of fuel with more desirable properties – including better heat generation during combustion.

Lead researcher Bin-Hai Cheng and colleagues used conventional, scalable chemical engineering processes to distill bio-oil made from five common plant wastes.

They found the most efficient plant material to use in generation bio-coal were rice husks, which they say are abundant worldwide

Their process involved turning rice husk into bio-oil which was then distilled and turned into the solid 'bio-coal' which has similar properties to fossil fuel coal without the polluting elements such as copper and nickelTheir process involved turning rice husk into bio-oil which was then distilled and turned into the solid ‘bio-coal’ which has similar properties to fossil fuel coal without the polluting elements such as copper and nickel

They used products commonly found around the world including rice husk, saw dust, wheat straw, bagasse, and soybean straw and distilled them to approximately 464 degrees Fahrenheit, resulting in a glossy black solid – coal.

The team studied the new bio-coal created from rice husk and found it was thermally stable and had an energy possibility equal to commercial fossil based coals.

The bio-coal contained very low levels of the cadmium, lead, zinc, and manganese, with no detectable copper or nickel.

‘This suggests it would not contribute to heavy metal-related air pollution linked to health issues’, said Cheng.

WHAT IS AIR POLLUTION?

Emissions

Carbon dioxide

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the biggest contributors to global warming. After the gas is released into the atmosphere it stays there, making it difficult for heat to escape – and warming up the planet in the process.

It is primarily released from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas, as well as cement production.

READ ALSO  SON Partners NERC To Promote Local Content Devt In Power Sector

The average monthly concentration of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere, as of April 2019, is 413 parts per million (ppm). Before the Industrial Revolution, the concentration was just 280 ppm.

CO2 concentration has fluctuated over the last 800,000 years between 180 to 280ppm, but has been vastly accelerated by pollution caused by humans.


Nitrogen dioxide

The gas nitrogen dioxide (NO2) comes from burning fossil fuels, car exhaust emissions and the use of nitrogen-based fertilisers used in agriculture.

Although there is far less NO2 in the atmosphere than CO2, it is between 200 and 300 times more effective at trapping heat.

Sulfur dioxide 

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) also primarily comes from fossil fuel burning, but can also be released from car exhausts.

SO2 can react with water, oxygen and other chemicals in the atmosphere to cause acid rain.

Carbon monoxide 

Carbon monoxide (CO) is an indirect greenhouse gas as it reacts with hydroxyl radicals, removing them. Hydroxyl radicals reduce the lifetime of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

Particulates

What is particulate matter?

Particulate matter refers to tiny parts of solids or liquid materials in the air.

Some are visible, such as dust, whereas others cannot be seen by the naked eye.

Materials such as metals, microplastics, soil and chemicals can be in particulate matter.

Particulate matter (or PM) is described in micrometres. The two main ones mentioned in reports and studies are PM10 (less than 10 micrometres) and PM2.5 (less than 2.5 micrometres).

Air pollution comes from burning fossil fuels, cars, cement making and agriculture

Scientists measure the rate of particulates in the air by cubic metre.

Particulate matter is sent into the air by a number of processes including burning fossil fuels, driving cars and steel making.

Why are particulates dangerous?

Particulates are dangerous because those less than 10 micrometres in diameter can get deep into your lungs, or even pass into your bloodstream. Particulates are found in higher concentrations in urban areas, particularly along main roads.

Health impact

What sort of health problems can pollution cause?

According to the World Health Organization, a third of deaths from stroke, lung cancer and heart disease can be linked to air pollution.

Some of the effects of air pollution on the body are not understood, but pollution may increase inflammation which narrows the arteries leading to heart attacks or strokes.

As well as this, almost one in 10 lung cancer cases in the UK are caused by air pollution.

Particulates find their way into the lungs and get lodged there, causing inflammation and damage. As well as this, some chemicals in particulates that make their way into the body can cause cancer.

Deaths from pollution 

Around seven million people die prematurely because of air pollution every year. Pollution can cause a number of issues including asthma attacks, strokes, various cancers and cardiovascular problems.

Air pollution can cause problems for asthma sufferers for a number of reasons. Pollutants in traffic fumes can irritate the airways, and particulates can get into your lungs and throat and make these areas inflamed.

Problems in pregnancy 

Women exposed to air pollution before getting pregnant are nearly 20 per cent more likely to have babies with birth defects, research suggested in January 2018.

READ ALSO  Drugs May One Day Be Delivered By Robots You Swallow

Living within 3.1 miles (5km) of a highly-polluted area one month before conceiving makes women more likely to give birth to babies with defects such as cleft palates or lips, a study by University of Cincinnati found.

For every 0.01mg/m3 increase in fine air particles, birth defects rise by 19 per cent, the research adds.

Previous research suggests this causes birth defects as a result of women suffering inflammation and ‘internal stress’.

What is being done to tackle air pollution?

Paris agreement on climate change

The Paris Agreement, which was first signed in 2015, is an international agreement to control and limit climate change.

It hopes to hold the increase in the global average temperature to below 2°C (3.6ºF) ‘and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C (2.7°F)’.

Carbon neutral by 2050

The UK government has announced plans to make the country carbon neutral by 2050.

They plan to do this by planting more trees and by installing ‘carbon capture’ technology at the source of the pollution.

Some critics are worried that this first option will be used by the government to export its carbon offsetting to other countries.

International carbon credits let nations continue emitting carbon while paying for trees to be planted elsewhere, balancing out their emissions.

No new petrol or diesel vehicles by 2040

In 2017, the UK government announced the sale of new petrol and diesel cars would be banned by 2040.

From around 2020, town halls will be allowed to levy extra charges on diesel drivers using the UK’s 81 most polluted routes if air quality fails to improve.

However,  MPs on the climate change committee have urged the government to bring the ban forward to 2030, as by then they will have an equivalent range and price.

The Paris Agreement, which was first signed in 2015, is an international agreement to control and limit climate change. Pictured: air pollution over Paris in 2019.

Norway’s electric car subsidies

The speedy electrification of Norway’s automotive fleet is attributed mainly to generous state subsidies. Electric cars are almost entirely exempt from the heavy taxes imposed on petrol and diesel cars, which makes them competitively priced.

A VW Golf with a standard combustion engine costs nearly 334,000 kroner (34,500 euros, $38,600), while its electric cousin the e-Golf costs 326,000 kroner thanks to a lower tax quotient. 

Criticisms of inaction on climate change

The Committee on Climate Change (CCC) has said there is a ‘shocking’ lack of Government preparation for the risks to the country from climate change.

The committee assessed 33 areas where the risks of climate change had to be addressed – from flood resilience of properties to impacts on farmland and supply chains – and found no real progress in any of them.

The UK is not prepared for 2°C of warming, the level at which countries have pledged to curb temperature rises, let alone a 4°C rise, which is possible if greenhouse gases are not cut globally, the committee said.

It added that cities need more green spaces to stop the urban ‘heat island’ effect, and to prevent floods by soaking up heavy rainfall. 

Source: Dailymail

Total Views: 67 ,
0
0

9 thoughts on “Replacing Traditional Coal With Bio Coal Would Cut Carbon Emissions — Scientists

  1. Pingback: levitra coupon
  2. Pingback: best cbd oil
  3. Pingback: order chloroquine
  4. Pingback: walmart cialis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *